Modern media has expressed values which demand an extreme diversity in relationships, beliefs, and focuses in life. Although rich and diverse, this extreme variety could lead to contradicting values that harm a person's well-being and moral value. But who can draw the line between what values are harmful or not? Whether the values are harmful or not, the question in C.S Lewis' article "Have no right to happiness" poses the question: do all humans deserve the right to happiness? To further clarify, we humans all have a right to happiness. The question is, however, on what basis should we pursue such happiness?
Mr. A and Mrs. B in the article portray a shallow sense of happiness; their basis on the pursuit of happiness seems to be their emotional state. To maintain their emotional contentment, they must restlessly seek further peace by abandoning all their past connections and responsibilities. Although there is nothing wrong with seeking emotional peace, it seems to be immoral that their definition of "happiness" is correlated to emotional, materialistic things, which leads them to seek only those things.
"A man has a right to happiness," Mr. A states in the essay. Happiness? Who could ever argue against a man's right to happiness? Although every man/woman does has a right to happiness, it is important to look deeper into the definition of "happiness." As stated in paragraph 1, it is important to look at the basis in which people pursue happiness, but also important to look into the meaning of happiness. As diverse individuals within a diverse community, we all have different views on what happiness is. I, for instance, define happiness as Korean food, God, and Pokemon. So from this example you can perceive that happiness ranges from temporary things to more legitimate, lasting things. Happiness can mean the fulfillment of one's mind, soul, or body. It can also mean a completion of an event, work, or action. It can mean something beyond the physical realm - something abstract, beautiful, and unthinkable. The concept of happiness, however different, is deeply embedded within each and every one of our minds.
Now that the general definition of happiness has been addressed, we would usually focus on how such happiness is applied to the Christian, moral way of pursuing happiness. But this time it is different. C.S Lewis states something that totally goes beyond our expectations on what happiness means. In the article, C.S Lewis states that happiness does not only relate to lovey, joyful, bright, smiley things. Martyrs, missionaries, and other Christians oppressed because of their faith do not usually experience the same surge of physical or mental joy we people go through. Through constant oppression, pain, and hopelessness on a daily basis, it is not possible to live by the emotional state of happiness day by day. Instead, they must dwell in a more secure, concrete source of happiness; something that goes beyond our finite selves - God. We Christians who are not engaged in such intense missionary activities all around the world do not have the urge to devote our happiness to God, because of the visible forms of "entertainment" that surround us and tempt us.
Pursuing our happiness to satisfy our never-ending hunger cannot be relieved by anything in the world. We must remember to focus on the single, divine entity that surrounds us, guides us, and leads us on to the bright future.
“But for them it was only the beginning of the real story. All their life in this world and all their adventures in Narnia had only been the cover and the title page: now at last they were beginning Chapter One of the Great Story, which no one on earth has read: which goes on for ever: in which every chapter is better than the one before.”
About Me
- David Ryou
- "I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else." -C.S Lewis
I like how you asked on what basis should we pursue happiness. That I think is a very important question that every person should ask themselves. Mr. A obviously thought abandoning his wife was acceptable. I wonder though his leaving her played a part in her reason for commiting suicide. Either Lewis chose not to go into depth about how that impacted Mr. A or it only impacted him slightly so it was not possible for Lewis to tell how Mr. A truely felt when he found out. I just got the idea that Mr. A was the kind of guy who thought of himself as #1 all the time. It makes me wonder hwo long a guy like that would stay with Mrs. B. I also think the same thing about Mrs. B though because she left her husband who had been severly injured by war and had lost his job. If a husband ever needed his wife that was the time when he needed her the most and she just left him.
ReplyDeleteThat was interesting - good job. It was neat that you talked about the definition of what happiness really is, and that it can be different for everyone. Unfortunately, in the case of sexual happiness, like what Lewis used as an example in the essay, I think it is something we all want. We are all sexual beings, and because we live in a fallen world, if we don't guard our hearts, I think anyone would have the sinful desire of Mr A. and Mrs. B. We must recognize though that it is immoral and wrong. I agree that we all like different things - ex. You like pokemon, whereas I am a music guy, but when it comes to deeper things like you mentioned, I think we are all the same because we are all fallen people.
ReplyDelete